The International Criminal Court Conundrum: ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's Troubling Odyssey

Subscribe to our free daily newsletter and stay informed about international cooperation and development, seen from Geneva.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has been plagued by controversy in recent times, with the case against prosecutor Karim Khan at the forefront of the debate. With 125 states party to the ICC, the proceedings against Khan are set to culminate on 24 July, when a vote will be held at the UN headquarters in New York to determine whether he will be removed from office.

At the center of the storm are allegations of sexual harassment against Khan, which have led to a highly contentious and unprecedented sequence of events. The administrative maze that has unfolded is a complex web of investigation, inquiry, and appeal, with each stage raising more questions than answers. As we delve into the intricacies of this case, it becomes clear that the very principles of international justice are at risk of being undermined.

The affair began in October 2024, when allegations of sexual harassment were first brought to light. Following an initial internal inquiry, the case landed on the desk of the ICC's bureau, a group of 21 states party to the Rome Statute, including Switzerland. Khan, the ICC prosecutor, was accused of sexually harassing one of his staff members. The case was swiftly swept up in the wider international context, with the prosecutor seeking arrest warrants against Israeli officials and Hamas leaders. Israel has repeatedly claimed that the court's arrest warrants are nothing more than a diversion, intended to draw attention away from the prosecutor's troubles.

The ICC's bureau took the unusual step of outsourcing the case to the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), a UN body equipped to handle internal investigations. While this move was unprecedented, it was in line with established norms. However, the discrepancy between the two bodies' operating procedures would have significant consequences down the line. The investigation, which ran to over 5,000 pages of documents, evidence, and testimony, took more than a year to complete. A panel of three judges was appointed to assess the legal standing of the case, a move that was both groundbreaking and poorly defined.

The judges, who worked on the case for three months, were sharply critical of the OIOS investigators, finding that they had failed to properly sift through the testimony, which had not been corroborated. Despite their conclusions, the ICC's bureau chose to interpret the results of the investigation in its own way. In a move that drew criticism from within the ICC community, the bureau decided to press ahead with disciplinary proceedings, despite the judges' findings that the evidence did not support the allegations of misconduct. The vote on 24 July will determine whether Khan's tenure as ICC prosecutor will come to an end.

The affair has sparked outrage within the ICC community, with many expressing concerns over the politicization of the process. Lawyer Sylvain Savolainen, representing Khan, described the bureau's decision as 'deeply troubling', stating that 'the diplomats are substituting their own judgment for that of the judges' analysis.' Senior Norwegian official Andreas Kravik warned of the need to 'respect due process' and avoid any perception that the process has been politicized. The alliance of Francophone African coalitions that support the ICC's work expressed its 'deep concern' over the affair.

Former UN investigator Dr. Ezequiel Jiménez described the whole affair as a 'serious stitch-up' against Khan and called the bureau's version of events 'misleading at best, and at worst a work of fiction.' Researcher Jiménez argues that the rules were 'improvised and changed as things went along, driven by a crisis-management logic.' He fears that some states on the bureau, including Switzerland, may have been focused on seeing Khan go in order to move on from the affair. While Switzerland's foreign affairs ministry maintains that the rules were followed scrupulously throughout, the incident raises concerns over the ICC's internal procedures and the independence of its judges.

Khan's fate will be decided on 24 July, when a vote will be held at the UN headquarters in New York. However, the implications of the affair extend far beyond the prosecutor's tenure. The ICC's credibility as a global institution is at stake, and the case raises fundamental questions about the principles of international justice.

Should Khan follow through on his threat to appeal to the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization (ILO), the saga could be far from over. As lawyer Ezequiel Jiménez points out, 'People struggle to grasp what's really at stake here, because the subject is so technical, but if Khan follows through on his threat, I think he would stand a strong chance of winning.' The case has already sparked concerns over the politicization of the ICC's processes and the undermining of its independence.

With the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio launching a frontal assault on the ICC, vowing to dismantle it 'brick by brick if necessary', the timing of the affair could not be more critical. As Dr. Evelyne Schmid, professor of public international law at the University of Lausanne, points out, 'Even if Khan did commit misconduct – which is not for me to determine – it is essential that the court and the assembly of states parties be allowed to see the process through calmly, and that this affair not be allowed to distract from the importance of the court's day-to-day work, or from the very serious substance of the arrest warrants currently in force.' The International Criminal Court is at a crossroads, and the future of international justice hangs in the balance.

Your morning update on International cooperation and development, seen from Geneva. Sent Monday to Fridays at 6 AM. We cover five core themes: Climate, Global Health, Peace & Humanitarian, Technology, and Sustainable Business & Finance, featuring opinion pieces as well as guest-edited newsletters. Free | Monday to Friday | Archives. The GS Monthly Digest is sent every last Wednesday of the month, featuring our top stories of the month for each of our five themes (Climate, Global Health, Peace & Humanitarian, Science & Technology, Sustainable Business & Finance) as well as the latest opinion pieces. The news platform covering international Geneva.